Navigation
Who's online
There are currently 0 users and 0 guests online.
Rubric
RUBRIC
|
Assessment Rubric
|
Points Possible |
| Brief and specifications (possible points: 5) | |
|---|---|
| Design brief, with no specifications or no problem statement | 0 |
| Design brief, but inadequate or minimal problem statement | 2 |
| Developed design brief with clear and comprehensive specifications and clearly stated problem | 5 |
| Research (possible points: 10) | |
| No or little evidence of investigation or research | 0 |
| Some evidence of research about the problem, but lacking depth | 5 |
| Evidence of good research and that the student has acquired new knowledge about the nature of the problem, what others have done to solve similar problems, and gathered other information critical to the success of the project | 10 |
| Ideation (possible points: 10) | |
| Only one solution considered | 0 |
| Two or three solutions generated, but only one solution seriously considered | 4 |
| At least three solutions generated, but reasons for rejecting alternatives unclear | 7 |
| At least three solutions generated, two seriously considered with reasons stated for rejecting others | 10 |
| Developmental work (possible points: 10) | |
| Little evidence of developmental work | 0 |
| Some developmental work of average quantity. | 3 |
| Good quality developmental work, including sketches; dimensioned drawings and models where appropriate | 6 |
| High quality sketches, drawings, renderings and models with attention to aesthetic, materials and assembly | 10 |
| Testing (possible points: 10) | |
| Product not tested | 0 |
| Product tested, but no presentation of results | 5 |
| Product tested with weak presentation of results | 8 |
| Product tested with good presentation of results | 10 |
| Evaluation (possible points: 10) | |
| No evaluation written | 0 |
| Poor evaluation with little thought, intelligent comment, or self-criticism; or containing unjustified self-congratulation | 5 |
| Good evaluation containing self-criticism where appropriate. Suggestions about possible alternatives which, if followed, could lead to improvements of the project | 8 |
| Good evaluation containing self-criticism where appropriate. Detailed reasons given for the success of the project or details given of the modifications or alterations that would ensure a successful conclusion | 10 |
| Prototype (possible points: 40) | |
| No work or very poor work showing no evidence of craftsmanship | 0 |
| Generally poor work with little evidence of craftsmanship | 15 |
| Average amount of work but with little evidence of care or craftsmanship | 25 |
| Average amount of work with several examples of attention to detail | 30 |
| Good quantity of work including realistic choice and use of materials where appropriate | 35 |
| Evidence of thorough work appropriate to time allotted, Prototype completed with attention to detail. | 40 |
| Presentation (possible points: 5) | |
| Poor presentation with no evidence of preparation | 0 |
| Fair presentation with some preparation evident | 3 |
| Good presentation with demonstration and appropriate media | 4 |
| Articulate and well planned presentation with demonstration and appropriate media | 5 |